For Whom Is U.S. Instruction?

For Whom Is U.S. Instruction?

In the new year, too, the United States continues to instruct other countries.

Some days ago, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of State prattled that the United States is in readiness to assist the Belarus people.

For whom is the assistance needed? In the past the United States meddled in the internal affairs of Belarus, vilifying the political procession in that country. On top of this, it enlarged the interference to the economic field and put economic sanctions on that country.

It had never made an issue of the disturbance that occurred after the presidential election in Belarus in December 2010. But the behind-the-scene wirepuller and source of the colossal amount of funds squandered in the disturbance were disclosed soon.

After then the United States took sanctions against that country.

It disparages presidential elections or parliamentary elections of some countries, saying that they neither conform to the international standard nor are free.

And in cases of some other countries, it turns its face from them, failing to lend an ear to the voice of the international community that the elections of those countries are unfair. It employs dual standard-- when the election is in accord with the American way of "view of value", it is fair and when the election does not conform, it is unfair. Such U.S. logic cannot work with other people.

In particular, it is necessary to mention presidential elections.

The principle of direct suffrage is applied to elections in all countries. Each voter directly casts ballot for the presidential candidate. However, the United States elects the president not by direct election but by indirect election.

The United States is accustomed to vilify the civil rights of other countries.

If so, is there no problem in the U.S. civil rights?

It is widely advertised that in the United States, the civil rights are based on "liberty" and "democracy". Such "liberty" has brought about dreadful catastrophe in actuality.

Last year terrible firearm crimes took place one after another in the United States, surprising the international community. The United States is paying dear for the "liberty" and "democracy" under which anybody has the right to possess and use rifles without restriction.

All the facts go to prove clearly that such instructions and assistance of the United States are not necessary for anybody and on the contrary, they are impudent.

Jo Thaek Bom