THE REVIVAL OF BOLSHEVISM
May 2008 – 20 years since the publication of the article by N.A. Andreeva “I cannot give up principles”
The concepts of LENINISM and BOLSHEVISM are the same. Each of them means the theory and practice of revolutionary Marxism in the epoch of imperialism, proletarian revolutions and the dictatorship of the proletariat, and the inevitable transition of humanity over from capitalism over to communism.
Marxism-Leninism is the philosophical-sociological, political-economic and social-political basis of the world-wide mission of the working class and its allies, summoned to put an end to all forms of oppression, exploitation, social inequality, violence and wars between peoples.
Bolshevism having originated in the theoretical basis of Marxism, was worked out by V.I. Lenin and exists as a “current of political thought and as a political party since 1903” (V.I. Lenin Complete Works v.41. p6.Russian).
After the death of V.I. Lenin, his cause – the continuation of the construction of socialism in one country, the strengthening of the organizing force of socialist construction – the Communist Party of Bolsheviks – was continued by his loyal disciple and successor J.V. Stalin. Under Stalin, under his direct leadership, the Soviet people built a powerful fundament of socialism, led the country to the level of a world superpower and defeated fascism in the Second World War. J.V. Stalin theoretically worked out and marked down the main ways for the gradual transition over from socialism to communism, including the liquidation of commodity production and commodity-money relations (“Economic problems of socialism in the USSR”).
However, after the death of J.V. Stalin into the leadership of the party and country arrived people, who were semiliterate in Marxism, who carried out a violent replacement of the Stalinist cadres of experienced, loyal to the cause party members, replaced by executive personnel who transformed the Party of Lenin- Stalin in an ever-increasing swollen quantity, into an apparatus of bureaucrats unable to solve state questions politically, badly knowing the laws of the social development of society – Marxism-Leninism, and moreover- who had started to deform the socialist economy by the introduction of principles into it used in the functioning of the economy of capitalism. This led to a sharp reduction in the speed of the development of the socialist economy. Khrushchev’s personal hatred towards Stalin became the basis of the malicious speech made at the XX Congress of the CPSU with the criticism of the so-called “Stalin personality cult” and the consequent anti-Stalin hysteria, which had begun inside the country and conducted by “loyal Leninists” for the entire time following it.
Was there really a “Stalin personality cult”? Yes, there was a cult of boundless trust and true all-people’s love to a person who gave his entire life to serving the people. (Stalin was even buried with his worn out boots and shabby military tunic. His relatives did not have to share any inheritance after the death of Stalin because there was no inheritance…..We also know that in the post Stalin period, the “loyal Leninists” – the party workers even of small caliber were already living under communism by level of their benefits gained on the sly from the people).
Yes, there was a Stalin personality cult because there was a PERSONALITY, a gigantic Personality to which after Lenin there was no equal in the world.
Pigmies of social science and “democrats” (mainly, Zionists fed with US dollars) after the XX Congress of the CPSU carried out a frenzied campaign of slander against Stalin and his cause, whilst at the same time misinforming society destroying its morals and moral-political unity. The erosion of the monolithic unity of Soviet people continued in all directions – ideological, political, and economic, in the moral and cultural plan.
Towards the 1990-s, under adequate material and ideological support on part of the USA of counterrevolutionary processes which had been developing within the USSR, counterrevolution was actually planned inside the country. Gorbachev became the conductor for implementing the plan by the USA for destroying the USSR. Former US president Bush (senior) admitted that “We spent a trillion US dollars on winning the cold war and compared to this sum, the sum which the USA now intends to spend (24 billion), this of course is small change. The democrats inside the Kremlin are able to guarantee our security much better now than nuclear missiles used to”. As we can see, Gorbachev brought super high profits to world Capital having betrayed and sold off the people of the USSR to our “best friend” – America, and “in one go” betrayed the international communist movement, the countries of socialism and delivered a crushing blow to the working class of the countries of Capital, who became deprived of their social gains won in the long and difficult struggle against Capitalism.
Gorbachev gave the start to his successors in power, in the betrayal of the interests of the nation – the Soviet people, to the benefit of the USA: to start with, “Czar Boris” (Yeltsin), afterwards, Sobchak’s aid Putin, and tomorrow (at time of writing) – his loyal successor blessed in Davos to the “throne” – Medvedyev….Mr. Putin has wholly zealously defended the interests of the USA in the flow of his 8 year presidency, having handed over to the USA Russia’s stabilization fund for propping up the entirely collapsing dollar instead of transferring it over to our own bankrupt enterprises and by this preserving work places for the breadwinners of families, or to our impoverished old age pensioners (the living standard for the absolute majority who live way below the poverty line), or towards maintaining hospitals and healthcare on the whole. Russian enterprises are going bankrupt even more, increasing the capital of the oligarchs, and people are being thrown onto the streets left by themselves and their families without any means of existence. Indeed the majority of enterprises in the USSR were mainly town forming. And the end to this political outrage is nowhere to be seen….
But what about the party - the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union) formed in order to defend the working class, taking on the responsibility of implementing the dictatorship of this class in its interests?
As spoken above, the CPSU after the death of J.V. Stalin became gradually degraded, transforming itself from a party of the dictatorship of the proletariat into a social-democratic party, into a party of Mensheviks. By the 1990-s, the CPSU was already a conglomerate of various ideological platforms and no longer defended the interests of the proletariat. Four platforms within the party occupied themselves with heated “discussions”, attempting to squeeze others from power. The democratic platform (dem-platform) consisting of the so-called “democrats”, mainly Zionists and also descendants of the Nepmen, bandits, de-kulakized people by Soviet power and self-de-kulakized kulaks, all kinds of swindlers in the form of newly appeared bourgeoisie from out of the managers of enterprises who had pocketed larges sums of state money, Zionistic cultural activists giving a bad picture about Soviet power and with outright hatred, betraying and crucifying our Soviet history, Lenin and Stalin. Social democrats in the face of middle and small party nomenclatura, secretaries of district party committees, party committees of large enterprises, scientific research institutes (NII) and Higher Learning Institutions (VuZ) who had disowned themselves from Stalin and the revolution and chattered constantly about a “new way” of development for the country, huddling themselves into the so-called communist initiative. The supporters of Gorbachev- were adherents of “perestroika”. The Neo-Trotskyites formed the so-called “Marxist platform” inside the CPSU”.
The brutal struggle of the enemies of socialism against our glorious past, the unruliness of the “democrats”, their open calls to people at a number of meetings on Dvortstovy Square in Leningrad and on the squares in Moscow for reprisals against communists – “Communists to the gallows”, the people’s disgruntlement over the absence of commodities and necessary foodstuffs in the stores, stashed away by enemies of the Socialist Fatherland, which in turn led to rebellions, emotional nerve-strain in mass conscience, especially among the youth, putting forth the demand for open and broad discussion in print, of sexual problems, rejection of centralized in the sphere of culture, the abolition of military conscription, the unhindered travel abroad (mainly to Israel) and many others – in such conditions in a state of society in the newspaper “Sovetskaya Rossiya” of 13 March 1988 there appeared the article by N.A. Andreeva “I cannot give up principles”.
What principles couldn’t the senior lecturer of the department of physical chemistry of the Lensoviet Chemical-technological University, candidate of science, the best curator of the student group of the university give up? What were the principles being talked about in the article?
- the necessity of a class view of the world,
- the understanding of the connection of common human class interests,
- an analysis of the events in close connection with that historic setting in which they occurred (for history is not politics, upturned in the past like Pokrovsky a well known academician- historian interpreted this).
- The inadmissibility of ignoring the objective laws of history, appearing in the activities of classes and masses,
- The inadmissibility of the absolutization of the subjective factor of social development,
- Research of concrete historical processes on the basis of Marxist-Leninist methodology as the only scientific approach in the study of any historical process,
- The inadmissibility of running down of the epoch of socialist construction, connected with the immeasurable achievement of an entire generation of Soviet people from the which modern day “democrats” demanded “repentance”(!)
In the judgment of the activity of J.V. Stalin – the outstanding statesman and political activist of the XX century – it is necessary to emanate from:
- the party-class interests of the epoch of storms and invasion, the brutal class struggle when the question is solved “The state of workers and peasants - to be or not to be” in the internal and international aspect;
- the dialectical conformity of the activity of the individual to the main laws of development of society, and not from the emotions of individual persons, deservedly repressed by Soviet power under Stalin as true enemies of the State of workers and peasants. Unfortunately, it is namely they and their descendants nowadays have come to power with the help of the West (USA) and destroyed the brotherly alliance of peoples with equal rights united into the USSR.
The disguised cosmopolitan tendency, the certain without-national “internationalism” is nothing other than the appearance of Zionism.
The national pride and national dignity of each people must organically merge with the internationalism of a united socialist society.
The letter by N.A. Andreeva “I cannot give up principles” was reprinted by 937 republican, regional, town and branch newspapers, not counting factory newspapers and newspapers of military subdivisions.
The newspaper “Sovietskaya Rossiya” in its jubilee edition of the 50th year from 1st July 2006, having reprinted the letter in full as one of the best publications in the newspaper during its 50 –year history, called the letter “a major political event, a landmark in the history of not just the newspaper “Sovietskaya Rossiya”, but also in the history of the communist party and the country as a whole”.
The letter divided society into two unequal parts: into supporters of the letter (that turned out to be 80%) and its opponents (20%). Such a ratio “For” and “Against” were shown in the letters which in large quantities arrived at the “Pravda” and “Sovietskyay Rossiay” newspapers’ editorial and at the department of physical chemistry at the Lesoviet LTI, where Nina Andreeva worked. Two large sacks full of letters which arrived at the Zhdanov University in Leningrad were not passed onto Andreeva and afterwards after being read, were destroyed. This was revealed by members of the editorial boards several years afterwards at a meeting.
It is namely the 80% of the readers supporting the ideas spoken about by N.A. Andreeva that frightened Gorbachev a lot. He was afraid for the fate of “perestroika”. This newspaper publication became the only subject for the two-week discussion at the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU, where Gorbachev compelled each of those present there, to express their own opinion in the form of: “Are you for Gorbachev or for Andreeva?” And if it was not for the cowardice of the members of the Politburo of the CC CPSU, then today we would not have had the problem of solving the problem of reviving the Socialist state and socialism. The ideologist of perestroika, A. Yakovlev correctly understood the essence of the letter having spoken out with a slashing article in the newspaper “Pravda” (5th April 1988), where he in particular pointed out that “….Maybe, the first set of readers in such concentrated form saw in this letter the non-acceptance of the idea itself of renovation a firm account of an entirely definite position, a position in essence, conservative and dogmatic. In essence, two main thesis, with red thread pass through all its content: why we have spoken much about this perestroika but have not gone far in questions of democracy and glasnost. The article calls on us to make corrections on the questions of perestroika, otherwise, allegedly, the “authorities” will have to save socialism”.
After A. Yakovlev’s slashing letter in “Pravda”, there began a persecution of the newspaper “Sovietskaya Rossiya”and the author of the letter.
A. Yakovlev correctly judged the letter to be a revival of that so hated by him, BOLSHEVISM.
But they were unsuccessful in morally breaking and destroying N.A. Andreeva. On 13 July 1991 in Minsk at the All-Union Conference of supporters of the Bolshevik Platform in the CPSU, a Bolshevik platform was formed inside the CPSU with aim of “reorganizing the CPSU, having returned to it, the organizational-political appearance and the ideological-moral role of the advanced unit of the working people in their struggle for the building of a socialist and communist society, to give a decisive rebuff to the bourgeois counterrevolution, with each day getting more dangerous and more dramatically sweeping the Motherland, to hold an extraordinary congress of the CPSU at which perestroika would be rejected as a capitulating anti-peoples policy, bring Gorbachev and his circle to party account for the destruction of the CPSU, the Soviet state, for betraying the cause of Lenin, October, the international communist and workers’ movement”. Other decisions were also adopted.
On the strength of the banning of the Communist Party in September 1991, a decision was adopted on the preparation and holding of a Constituent congress of a party of Bolsheviks. At the Constituent congress of 8 November 1991, the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (AUCPB) was formed. At the congress, N.A. Andreeva was elected as General Secretary of the CC AUCPB.
Lenin, on the basis of Marxism formed Bolshevism at the beginning of the XX century and a party of Bolsheviks, under the leadership of which the Great October Socialist Revolution was carried out, and became the organizer of the world’s first workers’ and peasants’ state – a state of the dictatorship of the proletariat.
The article “I cannot give up principles” published on 13 March 1988, laid down the start of the revival of Bolshevism in the conditions of the breakup of the USSR and extreme aggressiveness of imperialism at the end of the XX and the start of the XXI century.
The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks under the leadership of the N.A. Andreeva is carrying out a steady, consistent and selfless struggle for the revival of our great Soviet Motherland. And no matter how modern day imperialism rages, the growing wave of impending proletarian revolutions will sweep off the face of the Earth this criminal, anti-human system and open up new perspectives of communist development of human civilization.
We Bolsheviks will definitely triumph because our Marxist-Leninist principles have not been given to us on a plate, but have been gained by us on the sharp turns of history of the Fatherland.
On this we stood and on this we shall stand!
CC AUCPB
No comments:
Post a Comment