For Bolshevism - No 10 (139) OCTOBER 2014
Socialist Revolution
For Bolshevism Inside The Communist And Workers’ Movement
No 10 (139) OCTOBER 2014
FOR BOLSHEVISM-AUCPB
UKRAINE. THE ANTI-FASCIST UNDERGROUND IN ACTION
Reports from the fronts of New Russia (Novorossiy) from 21 – 26 August 2014.
On 21 August, mortar fire took place near the border crossing point
"Novoazovsk" targeting two towers and two border checkpoints of the MIA
of Ukraine. According to Ukrainian media, the platforms were destroyed.
On August 22, attacks on roadblocks were repeated. Snipers accompanied the mortar fire actions.
On 23 and 24 August in the city of Kharkiv, Ukrainian Red Army units
destroyed using heavy mortar fire, from 5 to 7 enemy cars of the
"automaydana." The fascists were left without transport.
On August 25, a group of DNR guerrillas destroyed a military convoy
of the Kiev junta sent from Mariupol Novoazovsk to assist soldiers of
the Ukrainian army, which attacked the self-defence forces.
On August 26, Zaporozhye guerrillas attacked a convoy of the National Guard, retreating from Mariupol.
After the start of the counter-offensive, by the army of the DNR from
Mariupol towards Zaporozhye, the punitive battalions of the Kiev junta
"Dnepr" and "Azov" began to retreat in panic.
As soon as they entered the limits of Zaporizhia region, their
convoy was attacked by guerrillas in the Zaporozhye region of Rozovka.
Breaking through the first barrier, the convoy was agin ambushed at
the entrance to Kuibyshev. The guerrillas fired on trucks from a
distance, making ineffective any return fire by the nationalists.
A number of trucks broke through towards Zaporozhye. The other half was forced to return to Mariupol.
However, at the entrance to the city, they were again attacked by the Mariupol guerrillas.
The People's Resistance has been steadily increasing against the Kiev fascist junta
As of the evening of 26 August, self defence forces of Novorosiya
managed to take the strategic heights of Saur-Grave and clean up from
the environs of the junta troops of Ilovaysk. The New Russia army
offensive continues in the direction of Mariupol.
This summary prepared on the material of the anti-fascist committees of Mariupol, Odessa, Kharkov, etc..
INFORMATION ABOUT ALEXANDER GERASIMOV
To all our comrades who were interested in the health of former
political prisoner ("Odessa case") Sasha Gerasimov, we can finally
announce the good news transmitted from Ukraine by comrade A.A.
Mayevsky.
On August 22, Sasha was finally released from the hospital. He underwent several operations.
We recall Alexander Gerasimov was injured by fire in the Odessa House of Trade Unions on 2 May this year.
For another two weeks he will receive out-patient treatment, but more
importantly, that he, according to his comrades, he said, feels more or
less normal again.
We wish Sasha a speedy and complete recovery!
==========================
DONBASS BETWEEN TWO FIRES
Donbass self-defence forces are defending their homeland from the
advancing forces of the neo-fascist regime in Kiev. The Kiev regime, in
turn, is trying to capture a region rich in natural resources and
industry. Shale gas in the interior of the region is needed not only
by Kiev oligarchs, but by their patrons in the West. Thus, the defence
of Donbass from the Kiev punitive troops is also a defensive war against
the Western imperialists.
The Donbass uprising began not just as a national liberation uprising -
in defense of the right to speak and write in their native Russian
language. It was conceived at the monuments to Lenin, which the locals
were protecting from Nazi-vandals. The founders of the Republic of
Donetsk, beginning with P. Gubaryov, talked about plans to build a
"social" state, which was opposed to the former, Ukrainian oligarchic
state. "A republic without oligarchy and corruption" - was the slogan of
the rebels. Thus, the People's Liberation component is closely
intertwined with the struggle for social liberation. The uprising gained
anti-capitalist overtones.
Such aspirations by the Donbass rebels caused alarm not only among
Ukrainian oligarchs, but also among their "colleagues" in Russia. An
uprising in Donbass was profitable for Russian capitalists, but only up
to a point – so long as it did not get back on track towards smashing
the capitalist system. If the Kiev fascist authorities simply want to
crush the rebels by military force, the Russian capitalists, including
those sitting in bureaucratic armchairs, are not averse to "Donbass in
their own arms." Military specialists and civilian coordinators along
with volunteers from Russia arrived into the region, arriving to
"assist", playing the role of the "Trojan horse". To substitute social,
anti-capitalist protest with exclusively pro-Russian sentiment - that is
their unspoken task.
Examples of when originally a "red" protest was replaced by tasks
not going beyond the capitalist system, have already taken place in the
1990s on the spaces of the destroyed USSR. In Transnistria occurred
bourgeoisification of the authorities, in South Ossetia the Communists
lost power, and in Tajikistan, the leader of the "reds" S. Safarov was
murdered. In all these regions, the insurgent people with the support
from Russia managed to defend their republics from the onset of external
enemies, but then bourgeois leaders came to power.
Similar negative trends are being observed today in the Donbas.
While the rank and file self-defence forces shed blood on the front, the
bourgeoisie is stealing power. One after another, there are draft
constitutions of the republics of Donbass, designed to consolidate the
capitalist construction of new public entities. In them read not only
concessions to the petty bourgeoisie, but also explicit promises of
immunity to big capital. If these drafts are implemented, one will have
to forget about republics with no oligarchy and corruption, and in
Donbass, a Russian version of "wild" capitalism will be replayed over
again.
Ordinary freedom fighters of Donbass will come to an understanding
of the struggle between two tendencies - progressive and reactionary. A
statement by one of the Donetsk volunteers is widely known: "If we raise
the red flag, we will win this war. Because this banner symbolizes the
simple, clear idea of giving the answers to almost all questions of the
present day. Only this idea is capable of consolidating society to fight
a common enemy and emerging internal enemy, which now sees how tomorrow
it will divide our land, our factories, our factories, our mines."
In such internal struggle during civil war there is nothing new.
Similarly, the Spanish anti-fascists in the 1930s, fighting against
Franco at the front, were forced to fight against internal traitors.
Similarly, the Greek communists after the expulsion of the German
occupiers in 1944 were forced to turn to guerrilla struggle against
their by then "own", Greek reactionaries, supported by the imperialists.
Under these conditions, the support that Russian communists will be
able to provide the Donbass Communists becomes essential. We are talking
about material and moral support. In conditions of the civil war going
on now in Donbass, reconstruction of the whole of the left is underway.
Opportunists lurk in the corners, but the real communists engage in the
battle for their native land. The "reformatting" the Donbass leftist
movement is expected, with the emergence of new organizations and
structures.
***
But at the same time, the events in the Donbass have become a real
test and "checking for lice" of the Russian left-wing movement. Among a
significant number of "left-wing bloggers" and "activists" have come a
well-proportioned chorus of (or howling) opportunists, who began trying
to "prove" that in Donbas a "wrong" revolt is taking place, that there
everything has been captured by nationalists (a variant: Putinists), and
in general, like in the movies, "all is lost, the plaster has been
removed, and the client leaves." We have a paradoxical situation: some
"leftists" have withdrawn their support from the Donbass uprising, and
then when because of this appears a growing right-wing, the "leftists"
joyfully shout: So you see, the right wing are winning ...
How and why did such a position arise on part of the Russian
"leftists"? In fact, everything is very simple: they became frightened.
Frightened of open rebellion. Philistines who labouring in the leftist
movement, are stalling the future socialist revolution for the
indefinite future. Even if Lenin suddenly resurrected and started a new
October Revolution, these cowardly philistines would still say that it
is "wrong Lenin," and that he did not wake up at the right time, that it
was "not that same October Revolution" ... Anything, if only by simply
not taking part in events, which "could finish off the system at the
root." And in the case of Donbass, the Philistines are afraid: that if
they supported the rebels, then they would immediately have to offer to
go to Donbass themselves. Therefore, they say that the uprising is
wrong, etc. All to justify their philistinism. Although one does not
have to go there necessarily, if one supports Donbass, especially if you
have no military experience! You can at least go out on a picket in
support of the Donbass communists, and not simply write on the Internet
defeatist sayings in the style of "all is lost, nothing will come of it
...". But the cowardly Philistines will never admit their cowardice.
However, we have already devoted too much time to the Philistines- opportunists!
Communists loyal to the principles of proletarian internationalism
and help to the fraternal Soviet people, are today at the forefront of
supporting the uprising of Donbass. Bolsheviks of the AUCPB - and those
that are now in the Ukraine, and those in Russia –are with all their
might assisting the Donbass rebels. Today is too early to talk about all
forms of assistance – in order not to harm those who are fighting, and
those who work under the condtions of the neo-fascist regime in Kiev in
Ukraine. But history will put everything in its place.
"Creation’s wisdom is in their boldness O blessed Falcon! You were
defeated and died pursuing your dream of freedom, of flying skyward.
Yours is the future – the blood you spilled, like sparks of fire, will
light the darkness of grim existence igniting hearts of countless many
with thirst for living "(Maxim Gorky “Song of the Falcon”)
Leo Zatsepilov
========================
THE SITUATION ON THE FRONTS OF THE DNI AND LC AS OF AUGUST 25, 2014
The offensive by the Kiev junta towards Donetsk from the north has
almost ceased. The attack on Lugansk and attempts to surround it by the
forces of the Ukrainian army have also failed. Thus, the general
offensive Kiev security forces which began July 1 to destroy New Russia
is now bogged down. Key defeats were suffered by the junta around the
area of Shakhtyorsky and Krasny Luch, then mired in bloody battles
around Ilovaiskaya and Yasinovataya.
According to plans, on the night of August 24, the army forces of
the DNR moved over to a large-scale offensive in the direction of
Donetsk - Granitnoye.
During the fighting, self-defence forces in Donbass liberated local
settlements - Novodvornoe, Agronomicheskoye, Novokaterinovka, Osykovo,
Klenovka, Stroyitel, Leninskoye. The DNR army during the offensive
completed blocked a powerful punitive junta group in the area of
settlements Voykovsky, Kuteynikova, Blagodatnoye, Alekseevskoye, Uspenka
and Ulyanovsk. Up to five thousand troops with weapons and military
equipment were surrounded. Further plans are being made to complete the
rout of the surrounded groups.
During the counterattack, self defence forces managed to destroy
more than 150 Ukrainian military "Smerch" battery systems (4 pcs.), 12
"Grad" units, 17 tanks, more than 30 armoured vehicles and around 50
ammunition vehicles with.
Warehouses have been captured, which store large amounts of
ammunition, materiel, food, and transportation vehicles. The Telmanovo
settlement was liberated and the road to Novoazovsk opened.
In August, the "Prizrak" brigade units under the overall command of
Alexei Brain liberated 14 settlements in the Lugansk and Donetsk
people's republics. 6 more have been surrounded by the self defence
forces.
LPR self defence forces liberated the villages of Belaya Gora and
Borovskoye, then advanced towards Severodonetskoye and Lisichanskiy,
arriving at the approaches to these towns captured by the enemy a few
weeks earlier, then attacked the enemy at Novoazovskiy. The town of
Schastya was liberated from the junta army (LPR). Under the control of
self defence forces of the LPR are checkpoints on the border with the
Russian Federation "Dolzhansky" and "Izvarino."
In the Kharkiv region (proclaimed on April 7 as the Kharkiv People's
Republic), are active guerrilla groups fighting against the troops of
the Kiev junta.
=======================================
AUGUST 15, DPRK NATIONAL LIBERATION DAY
The struggle of the Korean people against the Japanese regular
troops during the occupation of Korea lasted almost half a century, was
very difficult and unequal. The Japanese army was well supplied with
provisions and all the necessary military equipment. The Korean
guerrilla detachments were formed by the Great Leader Comrade Kim Il
Sung and led by him. They acquired their own weapons in armed attacks on
Japanese military forces and guerrillas were given provisions supplied
by locals fully supportting the struggle of guerrilla groups. The best
military fort, which the KPRA (Korean People's Revolutionary Army) was
based on in their fight against the Japanese, was the region of the
mountains of Paektu. It was a created by very nature itself into an
impregnable fortress, favorable for the defense of the revolutionary
army and unfavorable to enemy attacks. This area of Korea is
characterized by strong Korean anti-Japanese sentiments in the
population. The Paektusan guerrilla camp was a reliable mass base of the
revolution. From here, Kim Il Sung organized the raid operations on the
territory of Korea with large forces. In December, 1938 in
unprecedented cold with little or no food, sleep and rest, leaving the
environment, the soldiers of the KPRA had to make a forced march, which
lasted 100 days. This hike is carried out under the command of Kim
Il-Sung, went down in history under the name of the anti-Japanese
"Arduous March".
On August 8, 1945 the Soviet Union, performing the adopted at
Teheran and Yalta conferences commitments, announced war with Japan.
On the night of 8 August 9, the 1.5 million-strong Soviet Red Army
dealt a crushing blow to the land armed forces of Japan. The 10
million-strong Kwantung Army was defeated.
On August 9, Commander Kim Il Sung gave all units of the KPRA orders for a general offensive.
August 14, in his bomb shelter, the Emperor of Japan convened
meeting of the government and the high command of the army and navy,
which in spite of military opposition, the emperor offered a draft of
his rescript of unconditional surrender of the Japanese armed forces
under the terms of the Potsdam Declaration.
The day 15 of August in Korea became the day of national liberation.
The exhausting fierce struggle for the liberation of the Korean nation
from Japanese slavery ended in a triumphant victory thanks to the high
patriotism of the Korean population, faith in their leader and military
genius of the Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung.
In honour of this momentous day - August 15, 1945 - in the centre of
Pyongyang was erected a beautiful creation of architecture – The
Triumphal Arch of Victory
AUCPB
FURTHER PROMOTION OF THE MILITARY STRUCTURE OF NATO TO THE BORDERS RUSSIA
Documents of the Central Committee of the AUCPB
Summary of the main outcomes of the NATO summit in UK
On September 4-5 in Newport (Wales, UK) an extraordinary summit of
NATO was held, which was attended by the Heads of State and Governments
of the 28 member countries of the alliance, as well as representatives
of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Ukraine and
others.
The central theme of the summit was to discuss the situation in
Ukraine during the so-called anti-terrorist (punitive) operations in the
South-East of Ukraine and Russia's position on the issue.
The summit was preceded by are widely deployed in the world and
Ukrainian media propaganda campaign about the beginning of the "Russian
aggression against Ukraine," which forced the president of Ukraine
Poroshenko to cancel a planned visit to Turkey and on 28 August call an
emergency meeting of the National Security Council (the Council of
National Security and Defence) of Ukraine in connection with an
"invasion of Russian troops in Ukraine." Following the meeting of the
National Security Council, Prime Minister Yatsenyuk said that the
government had introduced a bill to parliament to abolish the
non-aligned status of Ukraine and the resumption of the policy of
Ukraine's membership in NATO. Yatsenyuk also said that Ukraine needs a
new military doctrine, in which Russia will be called an aggressor
country.
The ruling Bandera-fascist regime in Ukraine, fully controlled by
the West (USA-NATO) does not want to admit the obvious: the punitive
operation against the insurgent people of Donbass is failing, the
Ukrainian army is demoralized, disintegrating and unravelling in the
face of the self defence force - defending their homeland, defending the
right of people Donbass speak in their native Russian language, the
right to the fraternal friendship between the Russian and Ukrainian
peoples and will not accept any national-fascist ideology and
glorification of Bandera – who have crossed over to determined offensive
and liberating the punished cities and towns of the Donbass. The
rulers of Ukraine and the media under their control immediately renamed
the offensive by the self defence forces a "Russian invasion of
Ukraine."
It is against the backdrop of a fictional "Russian aggression in Ukraine" which the NATO summit passed.
At a meeting with journalists on the eve of the summit, NATO
Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that NATO plans to form a
qualitatively new rapid reaction force, "Now we have significantly
improved the readiness of our forces to respond. We will develop what I
call the best part of our response forces. This will force a very high
degree of combat readiness, capable of deployment in a very short
period of time." Rasmussen warned that the unit will be present in
Eastern Europe for so long as necessary. "Not because NATO wants to
defend someone, but because the threat has become more urgent and
tangible. We will do what we must, for the protection of our alliance
"- he explained.
Speaking at the opening of the NATO summit, Rasmussen accused
Moscow of the fact that it continues to destabilize the situation in the
east of Ukraine.
The NATO summit confirmed "willingness to provide collective
defence of all Allies from the West Coast of the United States to the
eastern borders of the alliance." "We continue to call on Russia to
withdraw its troops from the border of Ukraine, to stop the flow of
weapons and fighters to Ukraine, to stop supporting armed militants in
Ukraine and to engage in the constructive political process" - this how
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen summed up the outcome of
the summit, as always shifting responsibility of blame on others and
once again accusing Russia of events taking place in Ukraine, trained,
funded, inspired and unleashed by the imperialists of US-NATO to commit
aggression against Russia towards its capture, crushing and conquest.
The declaration adopted at the summit, stated that NATO "is
committed to cooperation with Russia and the development of constructive
relations with it," but this is are common words. In reality, NATO
upheld its earlier decision to suspend all civil and military
cooperation and alliance with Russia, while stressing that political
channels "remain open", meaning by "political channels" general
conversations, covering the further advancement of the alliance towards
the borders of Russia.
In addition, the declaration states that NATO will be engaged in
the study of the new "hybrid methods of warfare," which, according to
officials of the alliance, Russia has used in Ukraine. We need to
ensure an effective response by NATO to specific challenges presented by
threats of hybrid warfare, when a wide range of military and sabotage
operations are used by military, paramilitary and civilian structures in
a deeply integrated manner - notes in the final statement of the NATO
summit.
Following consideration of the "Ukrainian question" NATO has made a
declaration of its support for Ukraine in the face of Russia's policy
of "destabilization". The alliance has pledged assistance to Ukraine to
the amount of 15 million Euros.
NATO, represented by its Secretary General Rasmussen, hastened to
disassociate himself from the supply of arms and military equipment to
Ukraine. But, as is typical for this aggressive military organization,
made it in a two-faced hypocritical manner. "NATO as an organization
does not have its own weapons or military equipment - said Rasmussen. -
The decision to supply belongs to individual states. In this context,
NATO will not intervene in the national question of decision-making
countries of the alliance about military supplies to Ukraine." That is,
the question of military aid to Kiev is farmed out to the leadership of
the member countries of the alliance.
Barack Obama to prove "solidarity with the Ukrainian people,"
promised that 200 American soldiers will take part in exercises in
Ukraine. American military instructors and experts will come to Ukraine.
That is, Obama announced the long-known fact of the participation of
American military trainers and experts in the suppression of the
anti-fascist anti-bandera uprising in the South-East of Ukraine.
The question of the admission of Ukraine into NATO was not even discussed.
What specific measures have been developed by NATO?
The summit approved a Plan of action to increase the combat
readiness of the alliance. "The Action Plan is to improve the readiness
of NATO and provide a visible increase in the presence of NATO in
Eastern Europe" - said the secretary general of NATO. The Alliance has
decided to establish a special advance team of the Rapid Reaction Force
(RRF) of NATO numbering several thousand people which must be able to
deploy anywhere in the world in two days. The NATO Secretary General
said that he "has received signals from the Baltic countries, Poland and
Romania," who would like to place these forces at home.
Rasmussen also promised that the alliance will expand the "staff
and logistics infrastructure in Eastern Europe" to ensure the conditions
for the operational deployment of sea, land and air forces. In
addition, NATO "will now begin the regular holding of sudden maneuvers,"
which in the past two decades in the alliance were not observed. (It
should be noted that these "exercises" on peaceful civilians were
carried out during the NATO aggression against Yugoslavia, Afghanistan,
Iraq, Libya, ...).
Rasmussen said that the measures taken to strengthen the defence
are designed to convince potential aggressors that they will be up
against "the entire alliance."
The UK came out with the initiative to create the "new united
expeditionary rapid reaction force" for the family NATO countries before
the summit. More about this was reported in the Financial Times
newspaper on August 30. In these forces, in addition to the UK, will be
involved, Denmark, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Norway and the
Netherlands. It is alleged that Canada also shows interest in
participating. This force, known as the advance team of the NATO
Response Force, will be made up from 4 to 10 thousand people. They
should be ready to advance to the conflict zone in a matter of days.
The command of these forces will carried out by the representative of
Great Britain. Unofficially, these forces have been called the
"spearhead" force of NATO.
NATO plans to set up the infrastructure and the headquarters of
these forces, in particular, to deploy five military bases in Eastern
Europe. Willingness to take these bases has been expressed by the
Baltic countries, as well as Poland and Romania. At each base will be
located up to 600 soldiers and heavy weapons and military equipment,
including tanks and armoured personnel carriers. And all this directly
on the Russian border.
The decision to sign with the NATO an agreement to deploy a rapid
reaction force of the alliance on its territory on the eve of the NATO
summit was taken by Sweden and Finland.
Certainty in the NATO military plans has been made by Deputy
Commander of NATO in Europe, the British General Adrian Bradshaw, who
stressed at a press briefing that it should be clear that "Spearhead" is
intended to deter Russia. The Task Force of the highest state of
readiness will include components of all branches of the armed forces -
air force, navy and ground forces. In particular, the Navy will work
out the whole range of full-scale war, including mine and amphibious
operations, and the Air Force - strategic movement of troops. The
Deputy Commander of NATO also admitted that "Spearhead" will have "not
only conventional weapons." i.e. in question on the equipment of this
advance team of the NATO, the RRF will have tactical nuclear weapons at
its disposal, which carries a direct threat to Russia's national
security, the threat of a nuclear war.
The outgoing Rasmussen officially presented to the participants of
the summit, former Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg as the new
Secretary General of NATO. He will take up his duties on 1 October.
"I'll do my best to justify their confidence in me and follow the
excellent example of the alliance management - said Stoltenberg. - I
look forward to the opportunity to begin working closely with all 28
member states of the Alliance and further strengthen NATO." So there
are no personnel changes in senior management unit that will not change
the aggressive nature of this military organization of the imperialist
countries.
On the eve of the NATO summit, President Barack Obama on September 3
made a visit to Tallinn (Estonia), where he held a meeting with the
leaders of the Baltic States. During the visit, Obama declared his
readiness to "defend the allies." According to the president of the
United States, into Ukraine had entered "combat units with Russian
weapons and Russian tanks." "We need to unite in the face of Russian
aggression in Ukraine."
Thus, an enemy image is formed of Russia, the image of the
aggressor to justify in the face of the international community its
impending aggression against Russia.
A continuous series of military exercises conducted by NATO, aim to
work out the practical issues of preparing for US-NATO aggression
against Russia.
Thus during the summit, from 2 to 8 September in Germany, Estonia,
Latvia, Lithuania and Poland there were multinational large-scale
exercises, called Steadfast Javelin-II («The true spear" -ІІ). The
exercise involved hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft, as well as
more than two thousand soldiers. The main purpose of the manoeuvres is
to prepare troops for operations around the world in case of any
emergencies. The exercise participants are subdivisions of 15
countries, including 12 NATO countries - Bulgaria, Canada, Czech
Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Italy, Romania, Slovenia,
the UK and the USA, as well as Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia in the
framework of NATO "Partnership for Peace."
The first part of the exercise Steadfast Javelin-I was held in the
spring of 2014 in May 2014 with about six thousand troops from Belgium,
Denmark, Estonia, France, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Great Britain and
the United States conducting manoeuvres from 16 to 23 May, practicing
rebuffing attack scenarios on Estonia.
From 9 to 20 June, in the territory of the three Baltic States
there were NATO exercises under the name of Sabre Strike-2014. They
involved more than 4,700 servicemen from different countries, as well as
800 pieces of military equipment.
During the NATO summit, on September 5 in Minsk a second meeting of
the contact group to resolve the situation in Ukraine was held. The
meeting was attended by former Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma, Prime
Minister of the DNR Zakharchenko, head of the LPR Plotnitsky, Russian
Ambassador to Ukraine Mikhail Zurabov, as well as the official
representative of the OSCE chairman on the settlement of the situation
in Ukraine H. Tagliavini. The participants signed a ceasefire protocol
19-00 MSK on 5th of September. President of Ukraine Poroshenko
announced that he had ordered the chief of the General Staff to cease
fire.
But, like all previous cease-fire agreements, the agreement on a
truce was immediately broken. On the night from 5.09 to 6.09, the first
night after the announcement of the armistice, four residents of
Donetsk were killed by shelling, according to the militia headquarters.
The Ukrainian puppet Bandera-fascist regime, is blindly carrying out
the will of the United States, an continues the fratricidal conflict.
* *
The threat of war against Russia, threatening to escalate into a
Third World nuclear war is increasing with each passing day.
Reigning Putin regime is feverishly trying to restore the ruined
over the past quarter-century strategic defence nuclear missile
potential, to strengthen the armed forces of Russia in the face of
impending aggression.
But it is impossible just in a few years to restore what was
destroyed over the last 2.5 decades by the treacherous leadership of
Gorbachev, Boris Yeltsin and then his political replacement.
This criminal anti-national policy of unilateral disarmament was
carried out with one purpose - to curry favour with the American-Zionist
capital ruling the world to get the right to rule, the right to
personal enrichment at the expense of robbery in the course of
destroying the gains of socialism and of the predatory capitalist
reforms.
Only the revolutionary overthrow of the power of capital, the
overthrow of the ruling Putin regime and opposing his pro-Western
liberal-Zionist "opposition", and the restoration of Soviet power and
socialism, the revival of the Soviet Union and the mighty Soviet armed
forces can necessarily lead to victory over outgoing from the historical
arena rotting world capital and his monstrous creations - US-NATO
imperialism - forever put an end to wars and to secure to every nation
in the world the right to freedom of peaceful development, to a decent
happy life.
A.A.Maevsky
Secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (CC AUCPB)
September 8, 2014
ANNIVERSARY OF KOREA'S LIBERATION MARKED BY BRITISH ORGANIZATION
Pyongyang, August 18 (KCNA) -- The Korean Friendship Association UK
issued a statement on Aug. 9 on the occasion of the 69th anniversary of
Korea's liberation.
The statement said:
August 15 this year marks the 69th anniversary of Korea's liberation
by the anti-Japanese armed struggle led by President Kim Il Sung.
The Japanese imperialists tried to deprive the Korean nation of its
language and letters after occupying Korea by force of arms.
They also forced the Korean women into sexual slavery, plundered a
great number of natural resources and committed indescribable inhuman
crimes against the Korean people.
The President gave all units of the Korean People's Revolutionary
Army an order of the general attack for the country's liberation on Aug.
9, 1945.
Korea was fully liberated from the military occupation by the Japanese imperialists.
Today the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is advancing
dynamically while further strengthening its sovereignty under the
leadership of HE Kim Jong Un.
2. HOW WESTERN "DOCU-DRAMAS" ABOUT THE DPRK ARE BEING MADE.
http://juche007-anglo-peopleskoreafriendship.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/how-western-docu-dramas-about-dprk-are.html
A couple of years ago, during our trip to the DPRK, there was a man
in our group called David Kinsella, a documentary filmmaker from
Northern Ireland who has lived in Norway for the last 20 years.
What Mr. Kinsella was actually doing in the DPRK and what plans he
had for his stay in that land, I already have described in my sketch
"Red-red, freckled ..." (see English translation attached), so I will
not repeat myself here.
And here’s what happened after.
After the Korean comrades scrutinized more closely the "portfolio"
of Mr. Kinsella, including his "masterpieces" such as "Killing Girls"
and "Beautiful Tragedy", he never got permission to shoot his new film
in the DPRK. But it did not stop him from making another libelous piece
of "work", especially since he already had some film and photo
materials taken in the DPRK during his trip as a tourist. He is hoping
that they will be enough to give his future creation a certain degree
of plausibility.
But in reality, his movie "The Wall", much touted as an "
unprecedented film production in North Korea and Northern Ireland. A
David Kinsella film premiere 2015"
https://www.facebook.com/296500830364159/photos/a.763592873654950.1073741829.296500830364159/781156215231949/?type=1&permPage=1)
was filmed in the most neglected and impoverished ghettos of Belfast,
with South Korean actress Yuna Shin
(http://www.castingcallpro.com/uk/view.php?uid=296997 ), invited from
London and starring as his fictional North Korean Yun
Hee.
There are a few pictures of his future "masterpiece" (in the
attachment), and the first lines of the so-called "script" which
Kinsella already started to pen back in Pyongyang (in between countless
pints of beer at the hotel). His co-writer, Dutchman Klaas Bense, as
far as I know, has never even visited the DPRK.
Kinsella had no qualms about the lie that the shooting of his film
took place in North Korea, where men supposedly even "blocked the main
street in Pyongyang early in the morning" for the shoot.
But then he blurts out the truth on his Facebook page: "Location
scouting in Belfast and casting for "The WALL" We turn Belfast into
"North Korea"
(https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152292067955039&set=pb.573835038.-2207520000.1409390997.&type=3&theatre).
Funds for his trip to the DPRK and for production costs were provided
by the Norwegian Film Institute, that is, a public institution of that Scandinavian country.
According to Kinsella, it is "the second film of my trilogy on EVIL" (in capital letters, as in the original).
Do we need to say more, in order to understand what he is being paid for?
In The Wall we learn to take our own decisions and believe what we
see and not what others tell us to see, " - that is the theme of this
fabricated tale, in which we are told to believe that life in a
Northern Irish ghetto, where people live like this:
http://work-way.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Loyalist-bonfire.jpg
http://work-way.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/DSCF9027.jpg
http://work-way.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/DSCF9026.jpg
- which I see with my own eyes every day! -, is akin to life in the
DPRK, where people have no idea of what unemployment, drug addiction,
sectarian murder, and child alcoholism are.
You know, Davy, we think we can live without what you and your sponsors and bosses are telling us to believe!
An Irish Friend of the DPRK and KFA Member
3.CHANNEL 4 ANTI DPRK RUBBISH CONDEMNED
Pyongyang, August 31 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Policy Department
of the National Defence Commission of the DPRK issued the following statement on Sunday:
Recently the British 4th TV channel producers openly made public
a plan for producing and airing a serial TV drama-style movie malignantly slandering the DPRK.
The movie is nothing but a conspiratorial charade painting a wrong
picture of the DPRK's reality as it is based on a sheer lie
intended to give impression that the DPRK's nuclear treasured sword for
self-defence was manufactured by "illegally acquiring" nuclear
technology from Britain.
The broadcasting service is blustering without hesitation that the
purpose of the movie is to tell the world that the DPRK is the
"most closed country on the earth" and the "biggest threat" to the
Western world.
No matter how desperately the producers of the above-said TV
channel, hooligans and rogues under the guise of artistes, may work to
falsify the reality, they can never hide the truth.
The DPRK's nuclear treasured sword for self-defence is the proud
fruition of the defense industry in the era of Songun based on its own
efforts, technology and resources from A to Z.
The Juche-oriented nuclear power of the DPRK which is on the
ultra-modern world level is so powerful and tremendous that no one can
imagine.
The U.S., a master hand at plots and fabrications, dares not deny
this hard fact.
Those who are talking about "illegal acquisition of nuclear
technology" are no more than blind fools and idiots bereft of even
elementary ability to discern the truth.
The gravity of the situation lies in that this despicable
burlesque is being orchestrated at the tacit connivance, patronage and
instigation by "Downing Street".
This mud-slinging is a premeditated politically-motivated
provocation and deliberate hostile act to hurt the dignity of the
supreme leadership and tarnish the sovereign authority of the DPRK and its international image.
It is not exaggeration to say that Britain is the country with
inborn disposition of blindly copying the American-style diplomacy.
This is evidenced by the fact that when a movie company of
Hollywood distributed a preview of a reactionary movie peppered with
the story hurting the dignity of the supreme leadership of the DPRK
after producing it, the British broadcasting service deliberately used
it for staging such charade.
The British authorities should not forget even a moment the lesson
drawn from the incident in which that it was sentenced to
permanent death because of "poems of evil" which groundlessly slandered a country in the Mideast in the past.
Reckless anti-DPRK hysteria would only bring disgrace and self-destruction.
The British authorities should throw reactionary movies now being
planned or in the process of production into a dumping ground without
delay and punish the chief culprits.
This would help prevent any hurt to the image of the UK and
preserve the hard-won diplomatic relations between the DPRK and Britain.
It would be well advised to judge itself what consequences would
be entailed if it ignores the DPRK's warning.
ASSPUK, JISGE and UK KFA slam anti DPRK propaganda serial
http://juche007-anglo-peopleskoreafriendship.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/asspuk-jisge-and-uk-kfa-slam-anti-dprk.html
London 1st of September Juche 103(2014)
The ASSPUK, JISGE and UK KFA issued the following joint statement in
support of the statement of the Policy Department of the National
Defence Commission of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea on the
plan of Channel Four to make an anti DPRK serial "Opposite Number ";
We strongly support the statement of the Policy Department
of the DPRK National Defence Commission on the issue of a proposed
anti-DPRK tv serial.
The plan by Channel Four to make a so-called spy thriller "Opposite
Number " is yet another twist to the anti DPRK propaganda campaign by
the British imperialist media . This is all part of the Goebbelseque
"big lie" strategy of the capitalist media to slander and defame the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea , to brainwash the British
people into harbouring hostility towards the DPRK. We friends of the
DPRK and Juche Idea and Songun Idea followers of the UK cannot tolerate
such a thing.
This is not the first time that Channel Four have
shown anti-DPRK propaganda. Back in the year 2000 Channel Four
broadcast the notorious "Children of the Secret State " an anti DPRK
film that was filmed in south Korea and Thailand rather than the DPRK
but this footage was passed off as being in the DPRK.(it should be
noted that another anti-DPRK film in production "The Wall" is being
filmed in the poorer parts of Belfast and these will be passed off as
the DPRK).. The makers of the programme repeat all the usual worn-out
propaganda cliches about the DPRK "closed country " and " one of the
most dangerous for the West" . This clearly shows the intention of the
makers of the programme to slander and besmirch the DPRK and defame the
socialist system of the DPRK.
Channel Four is well know for producing
programmes of dubious repute such the so-called reality TV show "Big
Brother ", a real cultural cesspit.
The Channel Four tv serial "Opposite Number "
has a far-fetched and implausible plot which has no relation to
reality . The DPRK's nuclear deterrent is the product of the
Juche-orienated self-reliant industry of the DPRK and the efforts of
its efforts people under the Songun revolutionary leadership . The
DPRK's nuclear deterrent has been constructed using 100% DPRK
resources, labour and know-how, it is not the product of another
country .
It is deeply regrettable that Britain lacks an independent policy on Korea and instead kow-tows to the US.
We believe that if such a programme is shown it will do irreparable
damage to friendship and co-operation between the Korean and British
peoples and imperil diplomatic relations. Therefore the programme
should be cancelled at once. It is time for the British media to stop
blindly following the US and report the DPRK in a positive and truthful
way.
ASSPUK
JISGE
UK KFA
Speakers
there censured the chief executive for seeking to cover up the truth of the
disaster.
They asserted
that the regime claims it would protect agriculture with high tariff, but it
cannot withstand the pressures from foreign countries.